<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stephen Bleile &#187; twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stephenbleile.com/tag/twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stephenbleile.com</link>
	<description>Creativity, Clarity and Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:26:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Vs. Facebook &#8211; Why Twitter works.</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenbleile.com/communication/twitter-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stephenbleile.com/communication/twitter-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 04:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenbleile.com/?p=405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter is about finding people based on shared interests or ideas rather than finding existing relationships and discovering their ideas.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.stephenbleile.com/cms/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/twitter_logo.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-407" title="twitter_logo" src="http://www.stephenbleile.com/cms/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/twitter_logo-300x110.png" alt="" width="300" height="110" /></a></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p>I finally thought up how  twitter and say facebook or texting are so different.  <strong>Twitter is about finding people based on shared interests or ideas rather than finding existing relationships and discovering their ideas.</strong> So if I search twitter for &#8220;fly fishing&#8221; I&#8217;ll find other people who are interested in said topic.  I can then &#8220;follow&#8221; them and see what else they have to say about that and other topics. I may not know them (and they may not know me) but I may learn a lot about fly fishing and scratch my &#8220;i wish it was spring&#8221; itch all at the same time.</p>
<p>Likewise other people may query a word that I have &#8220;tweeted&#8221; about and then decide to follow me.</p>
<p>Facebook approaches the scenario from a different angle.  Facebook is based on pre-existing relationships.  I know john so I become his &#8220;friend&#8221; and then whatever he writes about comes up in my news feed.  Likewise whatever I write about comes up in his.  The downside here is that John (or the rest of my friends) may not be interested in fly fishing.</p>
<p>To me it would seem odd to search facebook for people interested in fly fishing and then ask them to add me as a friend.  I mean, we don&#8217;t know each other.  <strong>Twitter on the other hand doesn&#8217;t have the presumption of relationship.</strong> I can follow people and they can follow me whether we know each other  or not.  No pressure.  And if you don&#8217;t like what someone&#8217;s tweeting, no problem.  Just stop following them. <a href="http://www.stephenbleile.com/cms/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/mm_twitter.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-406" title="mm_twitter" src="http://www.stephenbleile.com/cms/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/mm_twitter.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>Twitter also has some unique features that I find really interesting:</p>
<p>1.  Functionally you can set up your blog, FB, and twitter to interact via twitter.  That is to say, update one and update them all.  This can be a serious time saver for the hard core social media type.</p>
<p>2. Because my audience is no longer limited to just people I know, my potential audience base grows.  In my case, not much &#8211; as I know most of the people who follow my tweets, but still it&#8217;s, at least theoretically, a bigger audience.</p>
<p>3. I can get to &#8220;know&#8221; people who aren&#8217;t my friends: celebrities for example.  There are many people I follow who I think are really cool, but that I may never meet.  By reading their twitter I get a better idea for who they are.  (I&#8217;m assuming their publicists don&#8217;t write their twitters.)  Sometimes you discover they&#8217;re nerdier than you might have thought or, of course, they may turn out to be pretty neat.</p>
<p>4. This a point from erick (@ecardoza) He says twitter levels the playing field.  You only get 140 words to say something so there&#8217;s no room for anyone to really shine with elaborate illustrations.  They have to say what they&#8217;re saying in a nice concise way.  This can make it a shallow relationship tool, but as I have already said.  Twitter is more about content than relationship so it works.</p>
<p>So there you have it.</p>
<p>Twitter is pretty cool.  You may want to get an account and see what it&#8217;s all about.  www.twitter.com</p>
<p>If you want to follow my &#8220;tweets&#8221; search twitter for &#8220;stevebleile&#8221; and you&#8217;ll find me.</p>
<p>Cheerio</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p>sb</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stephenbleile.com/communication/twitter-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

